beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant was delegated by the victim F, who was comprehensively in charge of the management of the above apartment unsold in lots owned by the victim (E) in Dong-gu, Nam-gu, the Defendant: (b) was in charge of the management of the above apartment unsold in lots; (c) on November 1, 201, the Defendant: (a) was in charge of the management of the above apartment unsold in lots by delegation from the victim F, who was comprehensively in charge of the management of the above apartment, and (d) was in charge of the management of the apartment unsold in lots; (b) the Defendant, who was a scrap metal business operator, at the expense of the victim, required to remove articles worth KRW 10 million, such as bedrara, rail, urban gas pipes, etc
2. The defendant's assertion and judgment
A. The Defendant asserts that the payment of the scrap metal received from G is merely a use of his/her fine with the consent of the victim F, and denies the facts charged.
B. 1) In the investigation agency and this court, the victim F made a statement consistent with the facts charged to the effect that “I do not have directed the defendant to remove the above apartment berarara rail and urban gas pipelines, and do not have consented to the defendant to use the proceeds of sale, such as the above urban gas pipelines at will,” while H and I, the witness of the defendant, make a statement consistent with the defendant’s defense. 2) The prosecutor bears the burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial, and the finding of guilt should be based on evidence with probative value sufficient for the judge to have a reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, there is no doubt of guilt against the defendant.
Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.
I would like to say.
3. However, the witness H and I's respective legal statements.