All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal (the defendant A: the imprisonment of eight months; the imprisonment of four months; the suspended execution of two years; the probation; and the community service order of 120 hours) is too unreasonable;

2. In light of the legislative intent of the Wastes Control Act, which aims to contribute to preserving the environment and improving the quality of people's lives by treating judged wastes in an environmentally friendly manner, Defendant A is in need of strict punishment for the instant crime; Defendant A is punished twice a fine for the same kind of crime; Defendant A again committed the instant crime despite the fact that he had been punished twice a suspended execution, and Defendant A again committed the instant crime; Defendant A is 115 tons of the quantity of wastes buried; Defendant B is deemed as the operator of H affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated affiliated waste collection and transportation business; Defendant B arbitrarily treated Defendant A food waste in excess of 15 tons for the purpose of gaining profits from part of the cost of disposal of wastes received from the company. The degree of participation is not less than that of Defendants’ age, character and behavior, home environment, and the circumstances and result of the instant crime, even if considering the circumstances that buried wastes have been restored to their original state, the lower court's punishment cannot be deemed unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.