1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On September 12, 2014, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of India (hereinafter “ India”), entered the Republic of Korea for a short-term visit (90 days of stay) and stayed beyond the period of sojourn, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on October 6, 2015.

B. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant issued a notification of refugee non-recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no “a well-founded fear of persecution,” which is a requirement for refugee status under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees,” which is a requirement for refugee status.

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 2, 2016, but was dismissed on April 21, 2017.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, Eul No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made to the hys who were sleeped by the hys members in the place where the plaintiff's assertion was made, and the hys who asked the hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion,” even if all evidence and arguments submitted by the Plaintiff were considered, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1)