1. The Defendants are either KRW 12,902,942 and their importance within the scope of the property inherited from Nonparty deceased C.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is with the network C (hereinafter “the network”).

As stated in the paragraph, a guarantee contract was concluded, and as the deceased did not pay the principal and interest to the lending institution, the deceased's obligation on behalf of the deceased was discharged from the claim for reimbursement against the deceased.

B.1) On October 20, 201, the Deceased guaranteed the obligation of 3,00,000 won to the Agricultural Cooperative. On November 27, 2014, 3,000 won and interest rate of 98,301 won and interest rate of 19,747 won, plus 3,118,068 won and interest rate of 17,000 won and interest rate of 17,000,000 won and interest rate of 17,000,000 won and interest rate of 17,00,000,000 won and interest rate of 17,00,000 won for the Agricultural Cooperative on November 27, 2014; 205, 30,000 won and interest rate of 17,00,000 won and interest rate of 20,030,000 won and interest rate of 13,0130,01.21.

C. Under the credit guarantee agreement mentioned in paragraph (b), where the Plaintiff performed the guaranteed obligation, the deceased would compensate for damages according to the rate determined by the Plaintiff in addition to the amount of subrogated payment, amount of loss, attempted guarantee fee, penalty for negligence, and fine for negligence. The sum of the above amount as of December 8, 2014 is 25,805,885 won and the interest rate for delay is 12% per annum.

The Deceased died on September 18, 2014, and his bereaved family members were their children. The Defendants were granted the qualified acceptance for inheritance of the Deceased’s property under the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon Family Court 2014Mo464.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including each number), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The Defendants, who accepted the judgment, are qualified.