logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.06 2016고정1095
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates B windowatom car as a job.

1. On October 31, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), driving the said car on or around October 11, 2015, and driving a two-lane radius of 114-ro 12, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, along the two-lane radius from the e-mail of prisoners of war

The course has changed into three lanes.

In such cases, when it is likely that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle may impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction of the change, he/she shall not change his/her course, and he/she has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle so as to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as accurately operating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and negligently changed the course from a two-lane to a three-lane, and the part on the left side of the Dician vehicle driven by the victim C (A. 35) who was driven by the victim C (A.) who was driven in a three-lane course, was shocked into the part on the right side of the driver's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in the right-hand part requiring medical treatment for about 10 days by occupational negligence as above.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by providing the same accidents as those mentioned in the preceding paragraph at the same time and at a place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and thereby damaging the said Grandn vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 744,400, such as repair cost, such as the Annbembum pis.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of traffic accident-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow