1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On June 3, 2010, at around 20:30, the Defendant, a public official of the Gwanak-gu Office, confirmed that he controlled the entertainment tavern “D” (hereinafter “the entertainment tavern of this case”) operated by the Plaintiff and only 3 studios of the Plaintiff. However, the Defendant confirmed that the blade was in a closed studio, but did not remain in the studio on the door of the studio, and ordered to remove it.

B. On June 4, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) had E carry the blades and caused the destruction of the facilities of the said blades; (b) confirmed with F, a manager of the entertainment tavern association, that the Defendant did not have any error with F, a manager of the entertainment tavern association at night 11:0,000; and (c) sold the instant entertainment taverns to himself.

C. On June 5, 2010 of the following day, the Defendant displayed the instant entertainment drinking house to two their children, but did not enter into a contract with the acquisition price offered by the Plaintiff too small.

On June 17, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with G for delivery of the instant entertainment tavern, and on June 19, 2010, the Plaintiff called the Defendant to the Defendant, who was in charge of having known the fact not sold it to himself, and was subject to heavy taxation on June 21, 2010. The Plaintiff was subject to heavy taxation disposition on June 21, 2010.

(e) The standards for imposition of heavy taxation on entertainment taverns are the cases where the area of a place of business (including the area for public use) exceeds 100 square meters and an entertainment receptionist (including persons temporarily employed) is placed, and the area of a separate and semi-permanently partitioned guest room is at least 50/100 of the exclusive area of a place of business or five guest rooms are located.

However, the entertainment bars of this case are not less than five guest rooms, and there is no difference between the criteria for not less than five guest rooms, and whether “at least 50 percent of the area of guest rooms which are semi-permanently partitioned” is “at least 50 percent of the exclusive use area of the place of business.”