Text
1. The defendant's KRW 50,000,000 and its amount shall be 19% per annum from September 23, 2006 to May 3, 2007 to the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The assertion and judgment
A. According to Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including additional numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the defendant (1) borrowed KRW 364 million from the Korean Commercial Bank on December 26, 1998 with the date of final repayment set by December 20, 2003; (2) the Korean EL non-profit-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-backed-off-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related----s.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 50 million won with 19% interest per annum from September 23, 2006 to May 3, 2007 and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.
B. The Defendant asserts that the claim claim of this case was extinguished by extinctive prescription after the lapse of ten years from the time of initial loan.
However, according to the facts acknowledged above, it is against the defendant by filing a lawsuit against the defendant on December 6, 2006, which was before five years elapse from the initial term of loan by a limited company specializing in the ELB-backed securitization.