1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

On January 2008, the Defendant reported the advertisement of the loan of the lease fund, which is published in the daily information book, and got a counseling on the loan to the borrower. The Defendant heard that the borrower may receive the loan of the lease fund if he/she submits the lease contract from a homeless employee.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C (a two-year grace period of imprisonment with labor for a limited term of six months) which is to prepare a false lease contract under 2 101 Dong 101, which is his/her name-free loan business operator and Silung City, which is his/her own property, received a loan of the deposit money by submitting a false tax withholding receipt and lease contract, and tried to have the loan divided.

In addition, on January 208, the Defendant, together with C, prepared a lease contract with the lessor C, lessee A, security deposit 48 million won with respect to the above housing in the above B B building 101, and around January 23, 2008, the Defendant filed an application for a lease loan of KRW 30 million with the employees in charge of loans from the victim bank located in the Gangseodong branch in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 23, 2008 when submitting the above lease contract and the receipt for tax withholding for wage and salary income in the name of the anti-di comprehensive development company.

However, the Defendant did not have any actual lease of the above loan, nor did he be entitled to apply for the loan of the loan of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease.

On January 30, 2008, the Defendant received KRW 30 million from the Korean bank account under the name of C for a loan on a deposit basis, by deceiving the victim in collusion with the above name-based lending business operator, and C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. A lease contract and a loan transaction agreement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;