logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.05.31 2016고정43
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 18:00 on October 26, 2015, around 18:00, whether she drinks with a female of 'in-si D'.

‘B’ and the head of B caused injuries to B, such as acute satisfal sat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by putting satisfe B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Application of five on-site photographs in Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment concerning the crime: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with a provisional payment order: The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Whether Defendant B is a mentally ill person or not, as stated in the facts charged, at the time and place where the facts charged are recorded

“Abreging a breg and breging a breg, thereby causing injury to him, such as cutting the bones of the breging part, which requires approximately six weeks’ medical treatment.

2. In light of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, A suffered injury from the bones of her fingers due to Defendant B’s act.

It is difficult to readily conclude, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① At the time of the instant case, A’s new fingers were plucked or plucked to the outside, and in the case of an injury to that degree, it is general to inflict serious pain immediately after the occurrence of the injury.

In doing so, A suffered the above injury in the course of making bomb with Defendant B.

In the process of balping, it was not true that there was no plucking or suffering due to the pain of the finger part in the finger, and it was found that his finger was plucking or plucking after completing balping.

The witness F testified for the same purpose in this court (the witness F testified for the same purpose in this court), and if the situation before and after flabbling is the same as A's statement, A is injured in the process.

arrow