logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.31 2016고정2141
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof in violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products shall place a false label or place a label likely to cause confusion therewith;

Nevertheless, from February 27, 2015 to June 19, 2015, the Defendant prepared and sold a restaurant operated by the Defendant located in Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, and the Australia Busan High-gu, which purchased from E in Busan High-gu, with the origin labeling board containing 349.9kg, and falsely marked the origin of the noise in the origin labeling board.

2. On July 2015, 2015, the Defendant also was found to have sold the instant restaurant in C cafeteria as described in the foregoing paragraph 1 to the regional economy and public officials of the Busan-do Office, on June 16, 2015, and was found to have been in use of the name of the representative of the said restaurant in order to be exempted from punishment due to the above control by using the name of the representative of the said restaurant was F, and the name was found to have been inspected by the person under the name.

When being investigated by the investigative agency, it is deemed that width was actually engaged in C, and that he was sold in Korea with G, an employee, as well as in Australia.

(d) sea;

If a fine is imposed, it will be within the limit of the penalty.

The phrase “F had the mind to make a false confession.”

Therefore, on June 30, 2015 and July 16, 2015, the Defendant appeared to F as Defendant at the intelligence team office of the Busan Police Station on July 2015, 2015, and was sold to F with Australia as Defendant C’s owner, and as Australia’s owner, it was sold to F.

A false statement was made.

As a result, the defendant instigated a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police in relation to F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G and H;

1. Each statement of H and F;

1. On-site photographs and copies of transactions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The origin of agricultural and fishery products that are subject to relevant laws and punishment for criminal facts;

arrow