A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. Under the premise, the victim D (Inn, 46 years of age) is a public official of the Cheongju District Court, who is the complainant of the accused case, such as rape with the Defendant F, violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (Habitual Intimidation), and violation of Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (obscenity using communications media), and the Defendant is a public official of the E-Gun Office, who works as the head of the debate office of the online newspaper company.

2. No person committing a crime shall prevent the provision of a criminal investigation team, such as a criminal charge or accusation, a statement, testimony or submission of materials, such as retaliation against him/her or another person's criminal case, or the provision of a criminal investigation team, statement, testimony or submission of materials, such as a criminal complaint or accusation, or a criminal complaint or accusation, cancel the criminal complaint or accusation, or threaten him/her for the purpose of making a false statement, testimony or submission

The Defendant, along with an explanation on the above-mentioned rape case from the person who was the person who was sexually wounded in the above F, received a request from the victim who was a public official, to have his real estate speculation and excessive service allowance received, had the victim receive a request for an article compromise, and had the victim receive the request to cancel the complaint by means of threatening the victim.

On June 17, 2014, at around 13:20 on June 17, 2014, the Defendant sent a phone to the above victim working at the planning and audit office of the Chungcheong E-Gun Office, and “The Defendant was the person who had access to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office prior to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, DC was the real estate input from the opposite relationship of F, and received the data unjustly received the excessive service allowances, and DC would be appropriate to withdraw the complaint of a case in which DC filed a complaint against F. It would be desirable for other public officials to have a large amount of money and the clothes of other public officials. The withdrawal of the complaint means that the Defendant’s cell phone at around 13:18 on June 20, 2014 would have been well living in the workplace.”