Defendants are not guilty.

1. Summary of each of the facts charged in this case

A. Defendant A’s fraud made a false statement to the effect that Defendant A newly built the Victim E house from B in 2003 to May 2004, using the fact that the victim was in short of normal judgment ability due to hearing disability 4, expressive language disorder, confinement language disorder, etc., Defendant A obtained a total of KRW 600,500,000,000 from the victim’s loan around July 26, 2007, and acquired the victim’s money from the victim to the Defendant’s 25,50,000,000 won as stated in the separate sheet as follows: (a) around July 26, 2004; and (b) Defendant A received the Defendant’s money from the victim to the Defendant, without the intent or ability to repay the money from the victim; and (c) Defendant A obtained the Defendant’s money from the victim to the Defendant’s purchase of the apartment; and (d) obtained the total of KRW 14,500,000,00 from the Defendant.

B. The Defendants came to know of quasi-rapes against each disabled person by having frequently dived in E’s house, which is the father of ordinary victim H (I), and the victim’s 30 or more times more than the Defendants led to the livering of the livering body (Intelligent Index (I Q) 59, Social Age 9, and Social Index (SA) 50). When they came to know of the fact that the victim was sexual intercourse with the victim by making the Defendants 30 or more years of 30 years of her mental body and followed the Defendants’ instructions. The Defendants B, B, (a), Defendant B, at the Defendant’s house 304-dong 302-dong 302, on February 203, 2003, the victim got off the phone from the Defendant’s home, and entered the victim’s body by taking advantage of the mental condition as above.