logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2010.04.30 2009노4018
상해 등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On February 15, 2009, the Defendant was required to present an identification card to the police officer F, who was conducting inspections at the above location while drinking alcohol on the front of D on the road located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and boarding and taking a bicycle, and was conducting inspections at the above location.

In the process, the Defendant did not conduct a usual inspection against the Defendant, and the Defendant followed the check by F with the Defendant, and the Defendant took a bath to “this franchise, age, franchise, check-up, check-up at the Army,” and committed assault by assaulting the F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’ss

나. 모욕 피고인은 위 일시, 장소에서 위와 같이 F과 실랑이를 하고 있을 때 같은 소속 경위 G, 경사 H가 피고인을 제지하며 “경찰관에게 이러시면 안 됩니다. 경찰관이 검문하는 거니까 이해하고 협조해주세요.”라고 말한 것에 화가 나 함께 검문을 하고 있는 경찰관 3명이 있는 자리에서 피해자 G에게 “넌 또 뭐야. 힘없는 놈들이. 니가 짱이냐. 내가 누군지 알아 씨팔놈들이 짜증나네.”라고 욕설하고, 피해자 H에게 “이 씨팔놈아, 개새끼야.”라고 욕설을 하는 등 공연히 피해자들을 각각 모욕하였다.

2. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the following evidence.

3. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not commit any injury or misunderstanding of legal principles against the police officers like the facts charged.

Even if the defendant committed such an act, this is applicable.

arrow