logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.13 2014나41676
수수료환수
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons stated in this part are the same as the entry of "1. Basic Facts" in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the basic facts are written or added as follows. Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The termination of the fee of KRW 1.3 of the third 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be made by using the "type of 1.3 fee".

The following shall be added to the fourth third written judgment of the first instance:

[The above 43 insurance contracts are the same as the "detailed details of the refund" column at the bottom of the "amount of collection of fees". B and the above "detailed details of refund" from August 31, 2009 to October 31, 2011 were concluded with J and 5 insurance contracts from February 2012 to May 201. At the same time, the above 38 insurance contracts entered into with C were revoked by recognizing that the above insurance contracts were incomplete sale (in the case of false or exaggerated explanation of the contents of insurance products, etc.), and the plaintiff was revoked by recognizing the 38 insurance contracts from February 31, 2009 to October 31, 201 and the above "detailed details of refund" as the 38 insurance contracts were concluded with J and 40 to May 2012 (in the case of false or exaggerated explanation of the contents of the insurance products, etc.), and each of the above 15 insurance contracts was revoked by recognizing the plaintiff's request for cancellation of the insurance contracts (as stated in the above 15th judgment).

2. The reasoning for this Court’s reasoning is as stated in the fourth interruption of the first instance court’s decision “2. Judgment on the Grounds for Claims” except in the following cases. Thus, this Court’s reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Pursuant to the fourth sentence of the first instance, "164,450.450."

arrow