logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단2043
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 27 through 37 shall be confiscated.

From the defendant, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

From April 7, 2018 to April 16, 2018, the Defendant administered the medication in such a way as to diversize the meconthic fluor, which is a local mental medicine, into water, at a place not known to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu or in a place where it is not known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness B;

1. Entry of each part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect to the defendant in the first and second examinations of the prosecution;

1. Investigative Report (A as a result of a simplified test on the A urine - MET training), investigation report (versing narcotics-related conversations confirmed on a suspect mobile phone), investigation report (A’s urine and the results of dives appraisal of seized articles), investigation report (calculated with additional charges), prosecution report (calculated with additional charges), and forwarding document - gene appraisal report, and delivery document - An appraisal report;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure (Evidence No. 7, 8) [No. 7 and 8] of evidence list : (a) the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant had not administered phiphones; (b) the defendant's simple test of the defendant's urine taken on April 16, 2018 (ACCTST) led to a reaction to train phiphonephones; (c) the defendant's urine taken and the result of the appraisal by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation on the defendant's urine taken on the same day correspond to the reaction to phiphones fostering phiphones; and (d) the DNA punishment detected in one of the 11-years of the defendant's residence on April 16, 2018 was consistent with the defendant's DNA punishment and reaction with the defendant's daily life with phiphones in the above phiphones; and (d) during the aforementioned testing, there was no specific doubt that the defendant's urine's urine or urine changed from 7 days.

arrow