logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.30 2015고단3243
횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Embezzlement;

A. In Mongolia around February 2014, the Defendant is the managing director of the “C”, a mine investment consulting company in Mongolia, which is located in Mongolia, from around February 2014, to the victim B. It can be punished with a big amount of money to be invested in Mongolia mine.

It is intended to help to purchase the mine in Korea.

“To propose the mine business, the Plaintiff delegated the authority to purchase the mine located in the steel frame “D” from the injured party, and agreed to purchase and operate the mine on behalf of the injured party by receiving the payment of the purchase of the mine and the payment of the operating funds for the mine operation.

On April 1, 2014, the Defendant, while receiving KRW 39,938,00 from the injured party to the purchase price of the mine in Mongolia, and then receiving KRW 300,938,00 from the time to May 12, 2014 as the purchase price of the mine and operating funds, embezzled the sum of KRW 273,40,00,00 as shown in the annexed crime list, under the pretext of personal debt repayment, etc.

B. On April 2014, the Defendant: (a) established a mining company in the E mine and appointed the victim as the representative director; and (b) purchased mar from another company and export it to China because the amount of local mar extraction was not high; and (c) purchased mar from another company and export it to China. The Defendant will purchase mar and export it on behalf of China.

“The proposal was made and delegated by the injured party with the authority to purchase marbles and to vicariously execute the Chinese export business.”

On May 22, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 147,487,50 from the injured party for the purpose of distributing mix and exporting expenses in China and embezzled KRW 130,000 for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc. around that time while receiving KRW 470,094,50 in total over ten times from that time to October 30, 2014.

2. The Defendant is not the representative of E, and there was no delegation of authority to conclude the above E’s agreement with the above E(State).

The Defendant around October 2014.

arrow