logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.04.27 2015구합4301
이주자택지 공급신청 거부 처분
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Case history

A. The Defendant is designated and publicly announced as a planned development district in the main city B and C, and is a project implementer who implements the D development project approved and publicly announced on May 7, 2007 (hereinafter “instant project”).

B. On October 208, the Defendant publicly announced that the following relocation and livelihood measures (hereinafter “the relocation measures of this case”) should be established and implemented in order to stabilize the residential stability of the residents in the project district, which would lose their residential and living basis due to the said project, after publicly announcing the compensation for the land and building owners in the project district of this case.

= A period of time for relocation and living measures = A period of time from October 21, 2008 to November 4, 2008: The method of filing an objection with the head of the office of the defendant (1641-6 floor of the office of the original city): A person who is dissatisfied with the relocation measures of this case shall be in writing submitted to the head of the defendant office: The method of implementing relocation measures: the supply of the housing site for migrants, the special supply of housing, the method of paying settlement money, and the method of paying settlement money: A person who is dissatisfied with the relocation measures of this case shall be selected and implemented by one method among the above methods. The basic date of selecting the persons eligible for the supply of the housing site and the housing site: (The date of notification made pursuant to Article 4 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Special Act on the Development of Enterprise Cities to hear the opinions of residents before the designation of the development district) and the person eligible for the payment of the housing site on December 15, 2006: The person who owns the housing lawfully constructed within the relevant planned area from this date to the conclusion date of the contract or the contract.

C. After that, on August 30, 2014, the Defendant publicly announced that he would supply the said housing site to those who selected the supply method of the said housing site for the migrants (hereinafter “instant housing site supply announcement”) with the following content.

= .

arrow