logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.10.23 2019나305296
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified, considering the evidence submitted to the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the part which is dismissed as set forth in the following Paragraph 2, and therefore, it is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the second page 8 of the judgment of the first instance, the first instance court deemed that “B, the Plaintiff occupied and managed the instant land by leasing the instant land to D, etc. via F, the Defendant’s mother F (D et al. submitted a confirmation of the fact that it leased the instant land from F; F was paid the purchase price and purchased the instant land on August 26, 2015 with the Plaintiff et al.; and the Plaintiff received rice on the pretext of rent.”

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow