logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.02.08 2015가단5895
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The forest of this case was originally registered in the name of the father of the Plaintiff’s father (hereinafter “N”), and N died on September 9, 1984, and the Plaintiff and the heir are the Plaintiff, P, Q, Q, R, T, U, and V.

B. The net W (hereinafter “W”) purchased the forest land of this case from N on December 12, 1987 in KRW 400,000, and filed a complaint against NN as the District Court 88Ra196, and on April 6, 1988 between W and N, “N shall implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for the forest land of this case to W” (hereinafter “the complaint telephone of this case”).

C. The instant forest land was completed on April 27, 198 on the grounds of the instant lawsuit telephone, on which the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the grounds of sale on December 12, 1987, and thereafter, the registration of ownership transfer as described in the following table was completed on the forest land: Defendant F. 1 on the date of registration No. 1 on October 7, 1989, the title holder of which was the date of registration; Defendant G G on October 5, 2000 on October 4, 200, and Defendant HH on April 24, 2002 on April 20, 200, and Defendant H on April 17, 2003, 206, respectively.

D. W died on February 8, 2012, and his heir was the spouse X, the Defendant C, the Defendant D, and the Defendant E, who are the spouse X and children.

[Based on recognition] For Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant H, and Defendant K: Each deemed confession (Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act) with respect to the remainder of the Defendants except the said Defendants: The fact that there is no partial dispute, Gap’s entries in subparagraphs 1 through 3, 5 through 8, and Eul’s 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings,

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, W, which was completed on the forest of this case.

arrow