logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.03.25 2020고단4365
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of road traffic laws in support of the Sungnam-gu Friwon method, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of road traffic laws in the same court on August 17, 2017.

On November 11, 2020, around 18:54, the Defendant driven a Damp vehicle with alcohol concentration of about 0.030% in the 1.5km section from Seongdong-gu Seoul to the front road in Seongdong-gu Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a statement on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving, making an investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver who is placed in driving in driving), keeping records of drinking measurement, notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking, and inquiry into

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry about criminal history, report on investigation (referring to the previous convictions and inquiries);

1. Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the fact that there are twice the same criminal records as the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment, the degree of principal practice is minor by 0.030% of alcohol level during blood, motive for the crime, Defendant’s age, etc., the punishment as set forth in the order shall be determined as ordered.

arrow