logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.06.08 2017고단349
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Switzerland car.

On January 26, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of 0.101% of alcohol concentration among blood transfusions on January 26, 2017, and driven the above vehicle along the influence of 0.101%, and 4 lanes in front of the iron in the luminous-si iron system was driven by the Defendant along the intersection of the 1st head line in front of the iron at the private distance of the Corporation, along with the one-lane of the iron.

At this point, the signal lights are installed and the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely depending on signal and lane.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant dunched the center line in contravention of the signal while driving without putting the front side properly, and funched the center line in contravention of the signal at one-lane of the opposite part of the Madet No. C (62) driving, who was waiting for the signal at one-lane of the opposite part, and continued to run the left part of the said ice No. 3 driver car with the port side of the said ice No. 1, and then, the Defendant dunched the line with the F of the victim E-driving in the signal waiting.

Ultimately, the Defendant, who was on the part of the above occupational negligence, committed a traffic accident with the said E, the victim G, H, I, I, and J, left the said car for about two weeks of medical treatment, left the pelle and tensions, and left the pelehouse and tension with the part of the pele that is in need of three weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, upon having the victim K undergo an peleropo-gun in need of three weeks of medical treatment, received the peleropo-gun, etc., and went away without taking necessary measures, such as rescue of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, C, K, G, L, I, and J;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident scene;

1. Investigation report on specific person under suspicion;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Specific crimes provided for in the corresponding provisions of the Act regarding criminal facts.

arrow