Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 100,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 14, 2017 to December 1, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a non-party C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) established on May 30, 2008 for the purpose of product design and consulting business.
The Plaintiff is an employee of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff asserted that he is the actual operator of C, but did not submit a certified copy of the register, etc. of C’s legal entity. The Plaintiff is Nonparty D (hereinafter “D”).
(B) In the Design Gazette of 20 registered designs (registration number F, etc.) for packaging containers, such as beverages owned by Company E, etc., the “author” is the “G” and Nonparty G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).
(2) The Defendant is a company established on June 3, 1971 for the purpose of manufacturing and selling foodstuffs, etc.
B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Central Research Institute (see, e.g., Nos. 6-1, 6-1, 6-3, etc. of the evidence Nos. 6-1, 6-2, etc.) held several meetings to prepare a new consensus for high-class food packing materials (containers, lids) from December 2008. The above-mentioned consortium meeting is held by the head of the marketing division I, the Defendant’s Central Research Institute J. FS Center J. of the Defendant Central Research Institute, the Defendant Central Research Institute K, the Packaging Development Team K, the MN Research Institute, and the Nonparty Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “O”) that were ordered to manufacture and supply the Defendant’s container.
(2) On June 2009, the head of the PP department introduced the Plaintiff from the representative director R of the corporation Q2, a company that produced gold punishment to the Defendant and supplied it to the Defendant, and introduced the Plaintiff to the Defendant.
On June 18, 2009, the Plaintiff, together with R and P, attended the 5th Congested Conference of Defendant Central Research Institute on June 18, 2009, and the Defendant’s 6th Contab conference on June 26, 2009, and shown 10% of the design design scenarios created by himself to the Defendant’s employees, and among them, the following.