1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit is due to the participation.

1. The reasons why the court has stated this part of the disposition are the same as the judgment of the court of first instance.

“90%” in the preceding part of the paragraph shall be added to “90%”, and 1.D.

In addition to the following changes, the above reasons are the same as the entry of Paragraph 1, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(d) On November 18, 201, the Plaintiff’s Office of Education and Human Resources Management notified the intervenors of his/her e-mail that he/she did not meet the criteria for reappointment as a result of the first evaluation of his/her achievements. On December 8, 2011, the Plaintiff’s Office of Education and Human Resources Committee deliberated on whether six former teachers of the retirement age system who fall short of the criteria for review of reappointment and three former teachers of the retirement age system, including intervenors, are requested to be reappointed on December 8, 201, two former teachers of the retirement age system are “scheduled to be published for Research (Conditional Requirements)” and the remaining four former teachers are requested to be reappointed as “Conditional Recontract (Conditional Criteria for Assessment)”; three former teachers of the retirement age system are decided to recommend their refusal to be reappointed; on December 21, 2011, the Plaintiff’s Personnel Committee provided that the former teachers of the retirement age system meet the criteria for reappointment; on December 21, 2011, the Plaintiff’s Office of Research and Human.