A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 26, 2015, at around 23:30 on 26:30, the Defendant: (a) received a notice of the revocation column; (b) received a notice of the revocation column; and (c) assaulted the victim’s left face at one time on the right drinking, with the victim’s request for returning home from the border D belonging to the said district; and (d) received a notice of the revocation column.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the duty of a situation room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of sentence alternative imprisonment (the degree and part of violence committed by the defendant, and considering the degree of interference with the execution of official duties);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant commits a crime, the first offender, the fact that the defendant commits an accident with drinking alcohol and contingently, and the fact that the wife of the defendant wishess to keep the wife of the defendant properly);