A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2019, around 00:15, the Defendant assaulted, around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) on September 21, 2019, whether the E officer belonging to the Daegu East-gu Police Station D District of the Daegu East-gu Police Station, who was called the Defendant, could pay a taxi fee; (b) the Defendant was able to ask the Defendant, “this fluor”, “this fluor,” “E’s chest two times in drinking, and the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and escorted to the zone D of the Daegu East-gu Police Station of the Daegu-gu Police Station, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, where he was arrested as a flagrant offender and escorted to the right fluor of

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies and property, prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. G statements;

1. A copy of the work log in the D District;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the various circumstances shown in the arguments in the instant case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstance after the crime, etc., in consideration of the fact that the police officer in the course of performing his/her duties is unable to exercise his/her force by actively exercising his/her force of force: The confessions and reflects