logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.10 2016고단183
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Seized evidence 1, 9, 10

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the name of the singing employee, the singing employee would call to many and unspecified persons to make a loan by misrepresenting to a financial institution.

The defendant was willing to take over the term ‘Maspoot passbook' under the direction of the staff of the phishing operations, thereby withdrawing the amount of damage and then remitting the amount to the staff of the phishing operations.

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall take over any access medium in using or managing the access medium;

On January 6, 2016, the Defendant received a physical check from a bus driver in the name of the post office in the name of C in compliance with the instructions of the trucking staff at the Daejeon-dong bus terminal, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, under the direction of the trucking staff.

As a result, the Defendant acquired the access media in collusion with the Defendant’s name-free singing staff.

2. In accordance with the above conspiracys as seen above, the employee in charge of phishing shall call to the victim E on January 7, 2016 to lend 3% loans to the ordinary people of 3%.

I would like to grant a loan of KRW 12 million if the amount of cash service received is paid because credit assessment scores are low due to the cash service received by the party.

“A false statement,” which received KRW 2850,00 from the injured party to the post office account in C around 11:04 on the same day.

Since then, the Defendant was ordered to withdraw money from the phishing employee, and the Defendant attempted to withdraw money using C’s cream card in the name of the post office account, as described in Section 1-A, but did not withdraw money from the wind whose payment is suspended.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the employees in charge of the so-called phishing, and received 2.85 million won by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow