All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. The Defendant, who was aware of the Defendant’s husband and wife, was the victim C (V, 56 years old) who was living together with the Defendant’s husband and wife, left the Defendant’s spouse and got the Defendant’s spouse out of the body of the victim.

I think that there is a complaint, and between July 13, 2016 and July 19, 2016, the victim using the mobile phone of the defendant, such as the statement in the list of crimes in attached Form 1, will be able to see in the future that the victim's "I am very little and I am about it."

“,” and “I will talk about the entire facts in front of the people in only one time with a good link at the auction house of nightner D.

It is so called Doz. Doz. Doz.

“Arhman D to find it?”, “Arhman’s son?”, “Arreb shall not be forgotten by the time of death”, and “Arhman’s knb between Manman and Manb.”

The victim threatened the victim by sending text messages more than 30 times in total, etc., and showing the attitude that the victim seems to pose any danger and injury to the victim.

B. The Defendant, on August 18, 2016, 18:00, expressed the victim’s oral dispute with the victim, who was found to be misunderstandings with the Defendant within the restaurant operated by the Defendant in Gyeyang-gu E, Gyeyang-gu. However, he expressed the victim’s face as “the bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, and the victim’s left side part is flick at one time in the restaurant.”

A4 The victim was assaulted by gathering the amount of the paper size of the A4, such as the victim's appearance towards the part of the victim.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. The assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3).