A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【2015 order 3281】

1. On December 8, 2011, the Defendant against D, at the Defendant’s office located in Seoyang-gu E Commercial Building 102, Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul around December 8, 201, the Defendant would complete the Defendant D’s construction of the Defendant’s house of 16,000,000 won in the cost of construction of the instant house of 16,000,000 won in 16,000 won.

“ ................”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party as the construction cost, it was thought that it was used by the Defendant for the repayment of the Defendant’s separate construction cost, and it was not possible to use the construction cost received from the injured party for the Defendant’s work. Accordingly, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to construct and complete the said house as promised by the injured party.

The Defendant, as the down payment for the same day, received KRW 50 million from the injured party as the down payment for the same day, KRW 30 million as the intermediate payment on February 24, 2012, and KRW 25 million as the intermediate payment on March 5, 2012 from each of the Defendant to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of his/her father H (Account Number I).

【2016 order 466】

2. Fraud to J

A. On May 15, 2013, the Defendant is expected to purchase a parcel of land, other than Soyang-gu L, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, and then divide into five parts, from the Defendant’s office located in Goyang-gu on May 15, 2013 to the victim J.

On the face of 300 million won, the ownership of 120 square meters out of the above land shall be given, and the ownership shall be given to the living facilities of 40 square meters in the first floor and the buildings of 20 square meters in the second floor.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not agree with the land owners on the price of the land, and there was no person to purchase the land together, and there was no intention or ability to construct the land to use the money received from the damaged person to other construction works.

The defendant, who belongs to this, is KRW 30 million as the contract deposit for the above day and KRW 5 million as the construction cost on July 1, 2013.