logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.01 2015나66815
보증채무금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional determination, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The defendant further judged that he/she had resigned from office of the representative director of D, and therefore the new representative director should be replaced, but the plaintiff's joint and several liability should be borne by the joint and several liability because he/she failed to perform the change of the joint and several liability. However, he/she resigned from office of the representative director and cannot be viewed as being terminated by the contract for joint and several liability, and the plaintiff's obligation

3. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow