1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On June 3, 2016, the Defendant selected approximately 3,00 young people aged between 19 and 29 who reside in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and paid subsidies (payment of KRW 500,000 per month and a maximum of six months), and openly recruited the target institutions to entrust the operation of the youth activity support project (hereinafter “instant project”), with the purpose of supporting the ability strengthening program including working and start-up business.

1. Entrusted affairs;

(a)Operation of youth activity support projects - Establishment and implementation of implementation plans for youth activity support projects - Support for the formation of voluntary communities among participants - 30 or less groups dialogue meetings (groups) - Holding of youth groups' meetings for information exchange, etc. - recording of monthly activities, ice ices and spread support - Establishment of the website and persons eligible for support;

(b) Information provision and field linkage to increase participation in society - strengthening of linkage, such as provision of youth policy information and support for direct and indirect activities - establishment of a social cooperative system, such as mentoring of areas of interest, through cooperation with youth support institutions and relevant agencies.

(c) Other administrative affairs, etc. deemed necessary to revitalize youth activities support projects.

2. Period of entrustment: From the date of conclusion of an agreement to June 30, 2017 (it may be extended after evaluation).

B. On July 4, 2016, the Defendant selected a village/Japan community, an incorporated association (hereinafter “instant corporation”) as an entrusted institution.

(hereinafter the above selection is referred to as “instant disposition”). C.

The plaintiff is a unemployed youth of 19 to 29 years of age residing in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Where a third party, other than the other party, is not the direct party to a judgment on the eligibility of the plaintiff, but the interests protected by the law are infringed by the relevant administrative disposition, the revocation lawsuit shall be instituted to obtain the decision of propriety