logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.09.03 2019나89159
추심금
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "The existence of the claim to be collected in a lawsuit for collection is a requisite fact" before the third 7th tier of the judgment of the first instance, and the burden of proof is added to the plaintiff (Supreme Court Decision 2005Da47175 Decided January 11, 2007). However, the third 15th th 15 of the judgment of the first instance is hard to believe " difficult to believe," and even under the premise that C has supplied a fingerprint identification device, RFD, or Symmetric (the price of the goods in question is KRW 11,921,940, KRW 10,318,90, KRW 90, KRW 31,504,00, KRW 304,030, KRW 100, KRW 263,030). Thus, it is consistent with the main sentence of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow