logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.04 2016재고단4
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the owner of B 21.5 tons of W dump trucks. Around June 11, 1993, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by loading freight exceeding 39.84 tons of total weight at the inspection station located on the Pump 635 lines of Dori-ri local highway 635 lines and operating the said vehicle.

2. As to the facts charged of this case, the public prosecutor charged a public action by applying Articles 86 and 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993 and by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) to the facts charged of this case. When an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the said Act in Article 86 of the said Act, the said corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the said Article.

“The Constitutional Court Decision 2011 Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga decided December 29, 201, retroactively lost its effect.

Therefore, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow