Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 16, 2017, Defendant A, at around 15:30, 2017, she danced with B in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu D and the “E” on the first underground floor (hereinafter “instant main shop”) and she suffered from the victim F (74 years old)’s working and tending. Defendant A suffered injury, such as the inside section, on the part of the victim, when the victim’s left snow on one occasion.

2. Under the same circumstances as described in paragraph 1, Defendant B asked the victim’s right side part and the left chest part of the victim F to the right side, and placed approximately two weeks on the right side and the side part of the back side in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first public trial protocol

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Criminal place, internal investigation report (related to the submission of a medical certificate of suspect F), investigation report (a witness's statement), investigation report (a witness's statement of witness H), investigation report (a witness's statement of witness I), investigation report (a witness's statement of witness J);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (suspects A, B, and F damage);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendants and their defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the assertion is that the Defendants unilaterally committed an assault against the injured party at the time and place specified in the facts charged, and there is no time or flag for the injured party.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the above assertion is rejected, since the defendants were found to have inflicted bodily injury on the victim by asking the victim as stated in the facts charged.

① The injured party at the investigative agency and this Court’s main point of the instant case is the Defendant in the course of dispute over the Defendants’ day-to-day and vision.