A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2018, 01:07, in front of Michuhol-gu Incheon City, the Defendant: (a) returned home in front of Michuhol-gu, Incheon; (b) the Defendant: (c) was sent to the police station C of the Incheon Southern Police Station, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station C, a police officer assigned to the police station of the Namnam Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 that the drunk was sent.

“In doing so, her body boomed the victim, her head, her head, and franch.” her body franched the victim, and her head franched the franch.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public peace and order related to the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. Scope of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one month but not more than five years;

2. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] crimes obstructing the performance of public duties, interference with the performance of public duties, and Type 1 (Interference with and Compelling the performance of public duties) (the scope of recommended punishment], from June to June (the basic area).

3. Determination of sentence: The crime of this case committed by the defendant for six months in prison and one year in suspended sentence is committed by assaulting a police officer in the state of detention and obstructing the performance of official duties, and the nature of the crime is not good. However, the defendant's perception of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and there is no record of the crime exceeding the fine imposed on the defendant, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined within the scope of the recommended sentence based on the sentencing guidelines.