logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.30 2017가합32718
공사대금
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a company established on March 12, 2010 for the purpose of the construction business, the non-interform structure dismantling business, the asbestos demolition work business, etc.

The defendant is a company established on September 30, 1997 for the purpose of non-building structure dismantling business, administrative vicarious execution, old house maintenance service business, various construction business, etc.

The Korea Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association”) ordered the Korea Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Housing Development and Development Project”) to undertake apartment construction related to the Korea Housing Redevelopment and Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Housing Development and Development Project”) on February 3, 2014. On February 3, 2014, the Korea Housing Development and Development Project entered into a contract with the Defendant for the removal and disposal of wastes (including asbestos), relocation and installation of obstacles (excluding value added tax), the construction cost of KRW 4.6 million for the relocation and installation of obstacles (excluding value added tax), the period from the date of the relocation of the association to the date of relocation and removal

On September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract to re-subcontract the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “re-contract”) with the construction cost of KRW 110 million (excluding value-added tax) and with the construction cost of KRW 110 million (excluding value-added tax) during the construction period from September 1, 2014 to August 31, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “re-contract for the relocation of the new district”) regarding the removal, etc. of obstacles within the new district (hereinafter referred to as “the removal of the new district”) during the construction cost of KRW 420 million (excluding value-added tax), and the construction period from September 1, 2014 to August 31, 2015, respectively, by re-subcontracting the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “the removal of the new district”).

On September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to revise each period of construction under the snow rental agreement and the contract for the removal of the new zone from September 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015.

The plaintiff on September 2015 to the defendant.

arrow