A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around August 22:15, 2012, the Defendant driving a BSM car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.134% at a distance of about 3km from the Do in front of the mutual influence point in the north-gu Seoul Metropolitan City at the port to the roads in front of the Nitan University located in the same Eup/Myeon located in the same Eup/Myeon.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving of BSM cars.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.134% in a temporary border like the above paragraph (1), driven the said SM car, and proceeded with the three-lane road in the direction of the Gidong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City at the port along two-lanes from the Young-gun to the port of port at the port of port.

At the same time, the victim C(n, 44 years old) was driving a D body-man car in front of the above SM car, and thus, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to properly operate the brake system while driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the operation system, and was faced with the front part of the EM car with the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, stopped the victim C with injury, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of a wood that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, suffered injury such as dynasium, tension, etc. from the victim E (the age of 53) who was on board the vehicle of the mastma for about two weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle owned by the victim F (State) to check the state of damage, and providing relief to the victim, even though the damage was inflicted on the vehicle of KRW 9.57,00 of the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police with C 1.