1. The Defendant’s KRW 14,840,447 as well as 5% per annum from November 29, 2014 to November 30, 2018, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Party C is a building located in Yongsan-gu E from D on September 30, 201, Goyang-si (hereinafter “Plaintiff building”) around September 30, 201.

(B) During the mutual use of “F” as the trade name of “F,” the Plaintiff and the insured on June 24, 2014, from June 28, 2014 to June 28, 2015, the general fire insurance contract between the Plaintiff and the insured on June 28, 2014 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The Plaintiff’s building and inventory assets of the subject matter of insurance, the purchase amount of insurance, KRW 3,867,563,200, the guaranteed matters, KRW 50,000, the inventory assets amounting to KRW 250,000,000 as security for fire insurance (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

2) The Defendant had operated “H” (hereinafter “Defendant factory”) in the building located in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City G located in the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City adjacent to the Plaintiff’s building.

B. The occurrence of a fire and its damage 1) A fire that occurred due to electrical factors and unabstinences at Defendant Factory around 19:51 on August 7, 2014 (hereinafter “instant fire”).

(2) The damages of the Plaintiff’s building and the Defendant’s factory were destroyed due to the destruction of the Plaintiff’s building adjacent to the Defendant’s factory. (2) The damages of the instant fire are KRW 69,775,137, the amount of damages of the Plaintiff’s building, KRW 619,015,00 as indicated below, and special costs (waste disposal costs) KRW 7,50,000,000.

Table;

C. As a result of the investigation into the fire of this case, the Japanese fire fighting unit that examined the fire of this case 1 as a result of the investigation into the fire of this case was “the fire fighting unit, according to the statement of two persons, was cut to the second pipe part of the Defendant factory, so that the fire fighting unit was cut to the end between the end and the end. The heat reduction time of the Defendant factory’s unmanned guard company was confirmed to be around 19:48, and the heat reduction time of the Plaintiff’s unmanned guard company’s unmanned guard company at around 19:53, and is presumed to be a fire that was laid

Although it can not be ruled out completely the possibility of an artificial factor, it is hard to confirm the parts of power distribution teams located inside the factory building of the defendant.