logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.06.20 2014고단579
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on March 20, 2014, the Defendant, as decks in the coastline B (69 tons) near the Bapopo-gun, was sprinked in a timely fashion to the victim for the reason that he was not sprinked well by the victim, including the victim E (56 years of age) at the residence of Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, for the reason that he was sprinked with the victim, while he was sprinked with the victim, he was sprinked up two times to the victim's face, following the victim, who was moving out of the house bed and taken out of the house bed and taken out of the house.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Notarial photographs, - Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines for not less than four months shall follow the lowest limit of the applicable sentences in cases where the scope of the sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines for not less than four months is inconsistent with the scope of the applicable sentences, so that he/she may choose the period of punishment as shown in the order within the scope of imprisonment for not less than six months but not more than two months, for not more than one year and not more than two months, for not more than one year and not more than two months, for violent crimes, for four types of assault crimes (special violence

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1148, Feb. 1, 201; 201Do113

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

arrow