The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by misunderstanding the facts, despite the fact-finding date, time, and place indicated in the judgment of the court below, and without any intention to inflict injury on the Victim G, even though he did not have any intention to inflict an injury on him.

B. The sentencing of the lower court (one year and six years of suspended execution on the one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts, in particular, the statement of the police statement of the witness G in the court below, the statement of the investigation report (on-site CCTV confirmation and witness investigation), the field photograph, and the CCTV inside the E-art photograph, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the victim G was brought into the police on the day of the crime of this case without saying that the defendant's "the defendant was F in the E-Maart stairs," and the victim G was brought into the police without saying on the day of the crime of this case. However, from the above stairs, the defendant 4-5 meters away from the above stairs, and was slick, and the defendant was flick, and the defendant was flicked with knife with knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k, and k k knife k.