logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.03 2014고단1225
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 23, 201.

1. On June 19, 2012, at the office D located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would purchase the victim E with KRW 75 million, one half of the market price, where the U.S. head and the 750Li vehicle was closely carried in, and the down payment is changed.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the ability to purchase the above vehicle at a half price of the market price, and was thought to be used as the removal work down payment with the above victim's money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received four million won in cash from the victim’s seat.

2. On July 6, 2012, the Defendant: “Around July 6, 2012, the Defendant purchased BMW 750Li vehicles in the United States by telephone to the victim at an insular location; and the vehicle inspection cost is KRW 5 million to the Republic of Korea. As soon as it should be handled promptly, the Defendant said that “the transfer of KRW 5 million to the bank account in the name of the Republic of Korea” was false.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have purchased BMW 750Li vehicles through U.S. charging money from the victim and was thought to be used as the removal construction contract deposit.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim transfer KRW 5 million to the Defendant’s bank account.

3. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) called “BMW 750Li vehicle entered the right-to-door port; (b) 500,000 won is required as soon as possible; and (c) made a false statement with the victim’s phone at an insular location.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not purchase the BMW 750Li vehicle, and he thought that he would receive money from the victim to use it as the removal construction contract deposit.

The defendant.

arrow