The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

... 환심을 샀다.

A. On April 21, 2015, the Defendant, who committed a crime, sent a phone call to the said victim on April 21, 2015, stated that “The said victim lent money to another person, but, at the latest seven days prior to the entry of money, borrowed KRW 10 million, and the said money is to be repaid within seven days.”

However, the Defendant was subject to civil litigation, and there was a seizure of the national bank and corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant, and there was no other property in the card payment amount of KRW 46 million, and there was no other income. The said money was used for the repayment of the existing debt and credit card payment. Therefore, even if the Defendant received the said money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay the said money to the victim within seven days.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

B. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement on June 1, 2015, that “The Defendant shall promptly prevent business money to the victim” at the home of the victim of Gangnam-si G apartment 102 Dong*****. However, the Defendant would promptly repay 4 million won if he/she lends her mother.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the above money even if he did not receive the money from the damaged party due to no particular property or income as set forth in the above paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 4 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

(c)

On September 10, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement on September 10, 2015, the victim’s house of the victim under the above paragraph (2) stating that “A traffic accident has occurred, but he/she is required to pay 12 million won as he/she lends 12 million won to the victim within seven days.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the above money even if he did not receive the money from the damaged party due to no particular property or income as set forth in the above paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.