The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

[Based on the premise] The Defendant is a multiple interest broadcasting companies that engage in activities under the name of “D,” and the victim E is a person who works as the representative of “F,” a store store sales company.

The Defendant entered into an advertising model contract with the victim from around 2004 to around 2006, and sold home shopping in the name of "G" with the victim. Meanwhile, the victim was released from prison as a criminal fraud from July 28, 2006 to June 30, 2009.

The defendant, in 2009, was asked for the use of the defendant's name in selling a boomhouse from the victim of the police officer's 2009, and was allowed to use it temporarily, and contributed to the advertising video, but there was a dispute over the quality of the boomhouse. The defendant's name was no longer used by the victim.

The conflict between the victims of defective damage and the defendant was deepened while they told the tax office to report the defendant to the tax office.

[2] Whether the Defendant contributed to the “H” program of the TV shipbuilding channel at a place where it is not possible to know a place around August 30, 2016 and did not collect money from a person who is proceeding with the program as a store store business with the victim

는 질문을 듣게 되자 이를 해명하는 과정에서 “ 그 여자가 어디 잠깐 학교 갔다 와 가지고 살려 달라, 도와 달라고 해서 내 이름 한 번만 더 쓰라 고 했는데, 학교에서 뭘 배워 가지고 나왔는지 구두도 계약이다, 계속 해야 한다며 계속 협박을 하더라.

“A victim’s reputation was damaged by publicly pointing out facts by publicly pointing out that the victim was confined to a prison.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a screen and a current status of accommodation on the Internet closure;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;