1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 13,993,100 with full payment from March 19, 2013.

1. On February 29, 2012, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the goods equivalent to KRW 10,670,000, which were 97 GW 10,749,000, and on March 30, 2012, the fact that the Plaintiff supplied goods equivalent to KRW 1,749,000 and KRW 1,5720,000 for videophone 0720GB 9 and KRW 1,574,100 for goods equivalent to KRW 1,574,100 do not conflict between the parties.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 13,93,100 won for the supply of the above goods and 20% interest per annum from March 19, 2013 to the day of full payment as requested by the plaintiff.

2. Judgment on a counterclaim

A. The Plaintiff agreed to return the attached goods to the Defendant as the Plaintiff’s sudden business scrap.

Therefore, the plaintiff should return the above goods from the defendant, and the plaintiff should pay 14,397,600 won at its value and 2,100,000 won at the storage cost of the goods and damages for delay to the defendant.

B. We examine whether the Plaintiff promised to return the attached goods to the Defendant.

The Plaintiff agreed to receive the attached Form Nos. 1 through 14 and the testimony of the witness B alone to receive the attached Form No. 1 and 14 from the Defendant.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff is liable to receive the return unilaterally by the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the defendant's counterclaim is without merit to examine further.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is justified, and the defendant's claim of the counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.