A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On March 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the support of Suwon Frigwon, etc. on March 9, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the former prison on December 9, 2016.

around 22:40 on April 27, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of 300 meters from the front day of Sindo-dong, Singu-dong, Singu-dong, Singu-dong-si to the front road of Singu-dong-dong, Singu-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si without the driver’s license.

"2017 Highest 2257"

1. On June 6, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driving a vehicle from the front day of Silsan-si, a member of Ansan-si, to the road of the Bolsan-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul-si, a vehicle from the 5km section without a vehicle driver’s license.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with a hurburged motor vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), and in violation of

On June 6, 2017, the defendant, around 23:30 on Jun. 23:3, 2017, had a two-lane road in front of the police box of the Gyeonggisan-gu Police Station, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, 901, at a speed of about 20 km in the speed of 1:00 each hour, and had a two-lane course changed.

In such cases, when it is likely to obstruct the normal passage of other vehicles running on the vehicle that intends to change the lane, the course shall not be changed, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by giving an advance notice of change of course and safe change of the lane through the direction of direction, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and instead changed the lane of the victim E driving in a two-lane, and received the front part of the Fchip taxi's left side of the fchip taxi as the front part of the fchip taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above business is weak to the victim.