As to each of the crimes in the 2019Gohap60 cases, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and the rest of the crimes.

Punishment of the crime

On June 26, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Jeonju District Court’s Military Accounting Branch, and the parole period was expired on March 28, 2014 during the execution of the sentence, and on May 24, 2014, on June 2, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Jeonju District Court’s Military Accounting Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2016.

"2018, 303"

1. On August 15, 2018, at around 21:00, the Defendant used the victim C’s bucks and spucks promptly using bucks and spucks, which are in confinement, with the victim’s sexual organ taken in hand from the outside of this buck.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts by force against the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 12:08, at the same place on August 16, 2018, flick the victim’s resistance was flicked with his/her finger, and glicked the victim’s sexual flag and resistance as his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts by force against the victim.

"2019, 60"

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) said that “The Defendant would pay 2% of the purchase price of the card every month to the victim F in E office located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, 2014, where he invests KRW 10 million per unit of the U.S. Enbrate rental business located in the G Union, he would be able to pay the profits of KRW 1 million every month if he/she invests KRW 10 million per unit of the U.S. Enbrate in the G Union, and purchase at a container at a discount of the H. Therefore, if he/she purchases and uses the machine card, he/she would pay 2% of the purchase price of the card every month as the profits.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not run a business leasing the U.S., and was able to receive a discount of 10% for the purchase of HH H H HH card, and did not have any structure to make profits by using the card, and even if it did not generate any other income, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the agreed profits to the victim even if it received the investment money from the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant is as above.