logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2017.09.14 2016가단47978
제3자이의
Text

1. On September 10, 2012, as to each of the items listed in the separate sheet No. 2 list between the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) Taesan Industrial Co., Ltd. and C.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. As of September 10, 2012, Plaintiff Tae Taesan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Tae Tae Taesan”) and C prepared a notarial deed as a notary public D’s No. 1496 on September 10, 2012. According to this, Plaintiff Tae Tae Taesan’s KRW 50,00,000 from September 10, 201 to September 17, 2012 determined and lent KRW 50,000 to C by the due date for repayment, as of September 17, 2012, for the purpose of securing the performance of the said obligation, C shall be recognized as a compulsory execution of each of the items listed in the attached Table 2 (the same as the title 1,2 of the attached Table 1 among the foregoing items) as indicated in the title of the said obligation (hereinafter “instant security transfer”).

B. As of November 30, 2012 between Plaintiff A (Counterclaim Defendant; hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) and C, a notarial deed was prepared by a notary public as of November 30, 2012 under the Korea-Mano No. 1066. Accordingly, the Plaintiff A specified KRW 20,000 as of November 30, 2012 and lent to C on December 10, 2012, the due date for reimbursement of KRW 10,000 as of December 10, 2012, and C leases each of the items listed in the separate sheet No. 3 (the period of lighting among the above items is the same as the 3 items listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list) as of December 3, 2012, with the intention of securing the performance of the above obligation. When mentioned together with the above 101 transfer contract, each of the instant transfer security contracts is concluded and acknowledged when C does not perform its obligation.

C. Meanwhile, based on the original copy of the conciliation protocol (the date of filing a lawsuit is July 25, 2012; hereinafter “instant conciliation protocol”) by Suwon District Court 2012Gadan95246, the Defendant applied for the execution of the seizure of corporeal movables under this Court 2016No. 1139 and applied for the execution of the seizure of corporeal movables on August 25, 2016.

arrow