1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicles”), and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded the automobile insurance contract with respect to C vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

Plaintiff

On June 4, 2016, 10:12, 10:12, in the course of entering the safety zone between the two lanes and the two lanes, which is linked to the two lanes in front of the Gyeyang Forest Co., Ltd., Ltd., and immediately enter the first lane, the vehicle was shocked by the part on the right side of the defendant's vehicle in the defendant's vehicle driving of the defendant joining the said first lane as the front part of the plaintiff's vehicle.

On September 12, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 7,845,00 as insurance money for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry, film, and whole purport of the pleading set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 6 (including paper numbers)

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred not only by the negligence of the Plaintiff’s driver, but also by failing to recognize the Plaintiff’s vehicle even though there was no particular obstacle to show the view of the Defendant’s vehicle, but also by neglecting the safety driving duty to be observed at the two-lanes, and the negligence of the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s failure to act concurrently with the Defendant’s fault. The liability ratio for the instant accident

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above 40% of the insurance money paid by the plaintiff as the compensation amount and the damages for delay.

3. The following circumstances, namely, the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s entry into the lane in which the Defendant’s vehicle proceeds from the combined road, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time does not enter the lane along the guidance line for the combined road, but rather enter the combined road and the Defendant’s vehicle.