1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relationship 1) The Appointed H is the denial of the network I, and the children of the Plaintiff and the Appointed J, K, and L are the children of the network I. 2) Defendant B is the denial of the network M, and the rest of the Defendants are the children of the network M.

3) The network I and the network M were deceased on October 8, 1980 due to a traffic accident between them, and the network M died on September 28, 201. (b) The network I and the network I died on September 24, 1963.

2.3. The registration of ownership transfer shall be completed on December 12, 1962 with respect to each of 3/4 shares in each of the real estates entered in the indication of real estate.

2 The net M shall be attached on August 28, 1981

2. Each real estate indicated in the indication of real estate (hereinafter “instant 1 real estate”) and the attached Form

3. The registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 5, 1967 with respect to the net I’s shares 3/4 of the real estate stated in No. 1, and the remaining 1/4 shares owned by Non-Party N, for sale on August 31, 1981.

3. He completed the registration of ownership transfer by reason of sale on March 5, 1967, with respect to 3/4 of the net I’s shares of each real estate stated in Nos. 2 through 14 and 1/4 of the N’s shares of each real estate.

3. Since October 14, 2009, the real estate No. 1 of this case was transferred to DefendantO on October 13, 2009 due to donation, and attached Form No. 1.

3. Each real estate indicated in the indication of real estate (hereinafter “second real estate of this case”) was transferred to Defendant D on January 13, 199 by reason of donation on January 11, 199.

4) On April 22, 2013, Defendant E completed a provisional registration on April 17, 2013 with respect to the instant real estate No. 1 on April 22, 2013, Defendant E filed a claim for ownership transfer registration based on a trade reservation (based on recognition). [The fact that there is no dispute, Party A’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (which include a serial number; hereinafter

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment as to the plaintiff

A. On March 5, 1967, the alleged MM did not have purchased the real estate of this case 1 and 2 from the deceased deceased, even though it had not purchased the real estate of this case from the deceased deceased deceased.