beta
Text
1. The defendant is classified into the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties listed in the annexed list of the appointed parties.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties indicated in the “List of the Appointed Party’s List” (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) were employed by the Defendant Company engaging in electric equipment and electric lighting wholesale business, and retired from office while providing labor during each service period under the attached Table “The Statement of Details of the Money and Valuables in Arrears”.
B. However, without the agreement on the extension of the due date, the defendant company did not pay the plaintiffs the wages and retirement allowances in the column of the amount of delayed payment in the attached Table “the statement on details of the overdue money and valuables by the
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination:
A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay each of the plaintiffs the amount stated in the column of the amount in arrears of each of the "statement on Details of the Money and Valuables in Arrears" attached to the separate sheet (wages and retirement allowances) and each of the above amounts to the plaintiffs, with 20% interest per annum from the beginning date of each of the calculation date of the damages in arrears of the attached sheet on the date following the 14th day from the retirement day of each plaintiffs' retirement day to the day of full payment.
B. As to the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiffs’ assertion is just a unilateral assertion on the sole ground of the right, by concealing the criminal act, such as occupational embezzlement, larceny, and occupational breach of trust, but there is no specific evidence to acknowledge such assertion (it seems that the above assertion is merely a matter to be sought against the Plaintiffs as a counterclaim, as alleged by the Defendant), and that the above assertion is not acceptable.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted on the grounds of all the reasons.