Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. From May 20, 201 to May 19, 2012, the Defendant leased a street log in front of “E” located in the victim C’s luminous life city owned by the Defendant, and operated the Donerz street. A.
At around 16:00 on July 18, 2013, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim “E” on the street, “E,” which is located in Ma, and thus, the period of the lease contract for the said Donerts, and thus the victim demanded the Defendant to remove it, and upon mutual dispute, approximately 10 persons, such as the neighboring merchants F, etc., were considered to have been in the presence of about 10 persons.
B. At around 16:30 on July 25, 2013, at the same place as the above “A”, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly pointing out that there are about 10 persons, such as neighboring merchants, such as F, etc., in front of viewing the victim as approximately 10 persons, on the same grounds as the above “A.”
2. This is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1). According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged as having expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.